

To guide the flow and distribution of their art, artists often require the ability to control and protect their own works. Our present social system makes this possible through copyright law, which gives the copyright holder a monopoly over certain rights over their work. Specifically, an author is granted a monopoly over the right to copy, distribute, publicly perform/display, and create derivative works of their own original works.
These rights belong solely to the artist author creating a work of original expression, or to another if the artist author makes the choice to sell their rights, typically for money or for notoriety through existing mass-distribution mechanisms. Or sometimes artist authors relinquish their rights in the process of collaboration, in order to create a unified ownership over a complex work created by many artists together (e.g. a film production). The present copyright system is expanded to include works that create even a modicum of creativity, including works not typically thought of as art, such as software, business documents, or other such humdrum. The original expression is protectable through proper understanding and use of copyright law. As an intellectual property attorney, I endeavor to assist artists and authors and distributors with their understanding and use of copyright law.

Specifically a patent allows an inventor (or the company such inventor sells his patent to) to control the right to make, use, sell, or import the patented invention. In present times, patentable technology includes not just a device or apparatus, but also processes, methods, and systems, so long as the invention is novel, useful, and non-obvious. As with artists, I aim at helping technological innovators understand and apply their rights to their novel creations.